A study of American legal test to be known against Apple filed a class action , leading to the motivation signal quality problems experienced with iPhone 4. If this case should be presented, will be classified as a "Potentially frivolous ( ie : potentially frivolous ) , to use terms with which Americans describe the most absurd allegations made in their courts.
Those responsible for the firm are Kershaw , Cutter and Ratinoff , a typical " law firm " bully overseas , in the already notorious for representing clients against some of pestilential Zynga about Farmville notifications . When the firm would collect data on class actions and has not yet set in motion the heavy , short-sighted legal superstructure of the United States,
but the content of the legal dispute has already clear:KCR is investigating potential problems encountered during the launch of the iPhone 4. If you bought the new iPhone and have been the victim of poor signal reception , loss of connection and fall of communication then we will be happy to hear more details on your experience .
In fact, according to American law , when the whole thing seems to fall in a typical formulation of the common law known as " Caveat Emptor " . Every customer who bought the iPhone before its release with the preorder , has renounced the possibility to automatically become aware of possible problems that usually presents a new hardware .
A period of initial bugs and malfunctions is reasonable and common market for consumer products tecnogici and one week is not a sufficient time so that Apple will resolve the defect. It is inevitable that in a time when iPhone reveals its first four flaws , someone trying to ride the wave .
Meanwhile we await news of the IOS firmware 4.0.1 should fix that , apparently , the bug that crashes the reception of the iPhone by tapping the bottom 4.
No comments:
Post a Comment